Name
piousbox

UserAllContent

Content by piousbox

Numbers (662) 638-XXXX are used by a scammer / fraudulent company - beware!

no blood-sucking parasites
Daily Grift

(662) 638-XXXX, 662-638-0312, 662-638-5821, 662-638-8891 appear to be phone numbers associated with fradulent activity.

One victim says: This company has called me several times also and wont send me information and not sure what they are talking about. What do they mean magazine debts? i WAS TOLD i owed them $507 dollars to cancel all remaining magazines. I had already received calls from this number a while back and I paid them tons of money. I believe there needs to be paperwork and it needs to be explained about what is owed.

User Comments

Hombre que demandó a Pepsi sobre Jet Fighter Finalmente obtiene su recompensa 30 años después
Well, our "supreme" judicial system ruled against Leonard, and I agree in this case. Because watching a TV ad does not constitute a binding contractual agreement. Even if the ad was serious (it wasn't), the ad is not a contract. Pepsi never owed Leonard a fighter jet.

Frontier is just milking the story for more PR. Good for them. Or rather, whatever.
Hombre que demandó a Pepsi sobre Jet Fighter Finalmente obtiene su recompensa 30 años después
Well, our "supreme" judicial system ruled against Leonard, and I agree in this case. Because watching a TV ad does not constitute a binding contractual agreement. Even if the ad was serious (it wasn't), the ad is not a contract. Pepsi never owed Leonard a fighter jet.

Frontier is just milking the story for more PR. Good for them. Or rather, whatever.
Man Who Sued Pepsi Over Fighter Jet Finally Gets His Reward 30 Years Later
Well, our "supreme" judicial system ruled against Leonard, and I agree in this case. Because watching a TV ad does not constitute a binding contractual agreement. Even if the ad was serious (it wasn't), the ad is not a contract. Pepsi never owed Leonard a fighter jet.

Frontier is just milking the story for more PR. Good for them. Or rather, whatever.
Man Who Sued Pepsi Over Fighter Jet Finally Gets His Reward 30 Years Later
Well, our "supreme" judicial system ruled against Leonard, and I agree in this case. Because watching a TV ad does not constitute a binding contractual agreement. Even if the ad was serious (it wasn't), the ad is not a contract. Pepsi never owed Leonard a fighter jet.

Frontier is just milking the story for more PR. Good for them. Or rather, whatever.
La corte de la UE respalda el procesamiento penal por compartir videos RT
To be clear: this doesn't mean that RT doesn't want piousbox dot com to share their content. On the contrary: that is encouraged. And it is the European Union centralists who say that sharing RT content is illegal because the content is banned.

EU lacks the first and second amendment freedoms that USA citizens seem to enjoy. Those freedoms are the right to free speech and the right to defend your free speech. I'm not saying USA has much free speech, but maybe Europe has even less.
La corte de la UE respalda el procesamiento penal por compartir videos RT
To be clear: this doesn't mean that RT doesn't want piousbox dot com to share their content. On the contrary: that is encouraged. And it is the European Union centralists who say that sharing RT content is illegal because the content is banned.

EU lacks the first and second amendment freedoms that USA citizens seem to enjoy. Those freedoms are the right to free speech and the right to defend your free speech. I'm not saying USA has much free speech, but maybe Europe has even less.
EU court backs criminal prosecution for sharing RT videos
To be clear: this doesn't mean that RT doesn't want piousbox dot com to share their content. On the contrary: that is encouraged. And it is the European Union centralists who say that sharing RT content is illegal because the content is banned.

EU lacks the first and second amendment freedoms that USA citizens seem to enjoy. Those freedoms are the right to free speech and the right to defend your free speech. I'm not saying USA has much free speech, but maybe Europe has even less.
EU court backs criminal prosecution for sharing RT videos
To be clear: this doesn't mean that RT doesn't want piousbox dot com to share their content. On the contrary: that is encouraged. And it is the European Union centralists who say that sharing RT content is illegal because the content is banned.

EU lacks the first and second amendment freedoms that USA citizens seem to enjoy. Those freedoms are the right to free speech and the right to defend your free speech. I'm not saying USA has much free speech, but maybe Europe has even less.
España: 70% de los inmigrantes no acompañados son en realidad adultos
Okay... spinal tap? Or did the migrants need to donate a finger?
España: 70% de los inmigrantes no acompañados son en realidad adultos
Okay... spinal tap? Or did the migrants need to donate a finger?