So basically, this is a fuck-you hiding in court. No freedom of speech for you, buddy.

So basically, this is a fuck-you hiding in court. No freedom of speech for you, buddy.

That's $1,392 per glove, for those counting at home.

Good.

I know people like this.

Steel industry requires a lot of energy. With continuous attacks on energy infrastructure, the steel (and all mining) industry is non-existent.

What's a "private detention center"?

...of course, there is no difference now between these AI's and regular search. Literally, the regular search wants to talk about yours feelings. We're stuck, there is no way outta here.

I actually think this is not a bad idea, if the pricing is reasonable. I always wondered: you can't stream copyrighted music, you don't have your own 3d engine to stream, but when you stream a game (with in-game music), that is okay.

Game engines are excellent 3d environments, pleasant to look at, and so forth. Are you renting that environment to show it to other people, did you get it for free? Even if you paid to own a copy of your favorite song, you can't stream that song for free (or for profit) to millions (or dosens) of other people. Why can you stream a game, even the one you paid for, without giving daddy a cut?

And again, my rationale mostly centers on how excellent some game engines are, how marvelous it is to look at them. So charging streamers for displaying it to an audience seems reasonable, especially if reasonably priced.

> the method uses less land and energy

> could ease the... environmental burden

Yes. Basically, humans are just meat bags. Human flesh is part of the carbon cycle. There is no intellectual existence to talk about, there are only industrial processes of growth and decay. That is where, conceptually, this politics is headed to.

P.S.: just wait for this to turn from optional to required.