Well, our "supreme" judicial system ruled against Leonard, and I agree in this case. Because watching a TV ad does not constitute a binding contractual agreement. Even if the ad was serious (it wasn't), the ad is not a contract. Pepsi never owed Leonard a fighter jet.

Frontier is just milking the story for more PR. Good for them. Or rather, whatever.

Well, our "supreme" judicial system ruled against Leonard, and I agree in this case. Because watching a TV ad does not constitute a binding contractual agreement. Even if the ad was serious (it wasn't), the ad is not a contract. Pepsi never owed Leonard a fighter jet.

Frontier is just milking the story for more PR. Good for them. Or rather, whatever.

Well, our "supreme" judicial system ruled against Leonard, and I agree in this case. Because watching a TV ad does not constitute a binding contractual agreement. Even if the ad was serious (it wasn't), the ad is not a contract. Pepsi never owed Leonard a fighter jet.

Frontier is just milking the story for more PR. Good for them. Or rather, whatever.

Well, our "supreme" judicial system ruled against Leonard, and I agree in this case. Because watching a TV ad does not constitute a binding contractual agreement. Even if the ad was serious (it wasn't), the ad is not a contract. Pepsi never owed Leonard a fighter jet.

Frontier is just milking the story for more PR. Good for them. Or rather, whatever.

To be clear: this doesn't mean that RT doesn't want piousbox dot com to share their content. On the contrary: that is encouraged. And it is the European Union centralists who say that sharing RT content is illegal because the content is banned.

EU lacks the first and second amendment freedoms that USA citizens seem to enjoy. Those freedoms are the right to free speech and the right to defend your free speech. I'm not saying USA has much free speech, but maybe Europe has even less.

To be clear: this doesn't mean that RT doesn't want piousbox dot com to share their content. On the contrary: that is encouraged. And it is the European Union centralists who say that sharing RT content is illegal because the content is banned.

EU lacks the first and second amendment freedoms that USA citizens seem to enjoy. Those freedoms are the right to free speech and the right to defend your free speech. I'm not saying USA has much free speech, but maybe Europe has even less.

To be clear: this doesn't mean that RT doesn't want piousbox dot com to share their content. On the contrary: that is encouraged. And it is the European Union centralists who say that sharing RT content is illegal because the content is banned.

EU lacks the first and second amendment freedoms that USA citizens seem to enjoy. Those freedoms are the right to free speech and the right to defend your free speech. I'm not saying USA has much free speech, but maybe Europe has even less.

To be clear: this doesn't mean that RT doesn't want piousbox dot com to share their content. On the contrary: that is encouraged. And it is the European Union centralists who say that sharing RT content is illegal because the content is banned.

EU lacks the first and second amendment freedoms that USA citizens seem to enjoy. Those freedoms are the right to free speech and the right to defend your free speech. I'm not saying USA has much free speech, but maybe Europe has even less.

Okay... spinal tap? Or did the migrants need to donate a finger?

Okay... spinal tap? Or did the migrants need to donate a finger?