Piousbox

Here we go, the un-humans are outlawing food. I'm sure we'll still be allowed to eat diabetes (sugar) and engine lubricant (canola and soy).

Even if you say that imposing a small tax on food production isn't outlawing food per se, this is a step in that very direction. The sick industry doesn't want people to be healthy, a healthy person needs no treatment! The industry wants everyone to be sick. Not everyone is a drug addict, not everyone consumes drugs such as weed, vape and alcohol daily. But almost everyone certainly eats daily, and modern food is a poison.

To illustrate how bad modern food is, consider this: as a society we're supposed to be progressing more and more. Yet, people aren't getting healthier, they're getting sicker. Life expectancy is actually lower now, than it used to be - either due to the society being past peak oil (a subject for a different conversation), or because institutions such as Pfizer want to see the society sick, rather than well.

Milk has always been a contentuous food topic. In the USA, police would raid milk producers and put them in jail. Supposedly that was because profit margins on milk were so small, that the big food-industrial complex could not compete with small farmers. Government oppression of small farmers then followed:

Now, slapping a small tax on cow ownership doesn't seem as harsh as putting a farmer in jail, but it does in the same direction: actual, normal, good food is being taken away and unavailable to people.

There is a reason why fast food and quick food is manufactured by the same companies that gave us tobacco, nicotine and lung cancer deaths. Modern food is designed to be as addictive as tobacco. 

Remember to eat well! Fish, meat and eggs, milk and cheese, no carbs, no processed foods, no additives and certainly no sugar. Food shouldn't be addictive. It's natural to feel hungry: you should eat after you feel hungry, not eat because food is available and addictive.