UserAllContent
Content by piousbox
Лечу как-то очень давно в Барселону.Чезаре Беккариа - человек, который заставил задуматься о совести.
В этот день, 15 марта 1738, родился человек, бросивший вызов жестокости законов.
Представьте себе XVIII век.
Европа, где следственные пытки, хоть и постепенно выходят из обихода, всё ещё применяются в некоторых странах, а площади городов то и дело становятся местом для публичных казней.
Здесь каждый приговор - это не только судьба отдельного человека, но и зрелище для толпы: плети, колёса, эшафоты.
И вот в этом мире, где жестокость остаётся частью правовой системы, появляется Чезаре Беккариа - миланский маркиз с лицом философа и смелостью революционера.
Кому "шуточки за 300", а нам - спасибо трактористу!
Кому "шуточки за 300", а нам - спасибо трактористу!
Я вырос в деревне. У соседей была очень агрессивная собака. Частенько срывалась с привязи и бегала по улице, кошмаря взрослых и детей.
Конец всему этому положил тракторист, который вспахал им огород. Она вцепилась ему в предплечье, чуть ниже локтя, мёртвой хваткой. Он (здоровенный парень) протащил её на своей руке несколько метров до трактора, вытащил из кабины топор, и зарубил её. Затем пошёл и набил е$альник хозяину собаки, которому только что вспахал огород ))).
Настало время 60+, надо сходить к дохтурам посоветоваться, стоит ли вообще дальше…
Настало время 60+, надо сходить к дохтурам посоветоваться, стоит ли вообще дальше…
Дабы без очередей нашли вариант в платной клинике, записались.
Принимает такая доктор со спортивной фигуркой, свежим личиком, начинает мне лапшу про здоровый образ жизни, правильное питание, гимнастику, растяжки какие-то.
Все выслушал и говорю:
Знакомый мой, Николай Васильевич, безвыездно прожил в Брянске, на одной работе, двигаясь неспешно по службе. Хотя до финансовой кормушки так и не допустили...
Знакомый мой, Николай Васильевич, безвыездно прожил в Брянске, на одной работе, двигаясь неспешно по службе. Хотя до финансовой кормушки так и не допустили. Последнее время он упорно и тщательно готовился к старости. Постоянно перерабатывал, чтобы хоть чуть повысить пенсию. По выходным - шабашил настройкой станков. Постоянно откладывал и экономил в быту, дабы увеличить сбережения. Жизнь без работы он представлял смутно, в виде домика с неизбежной деградацией на огороде.
События, о которых пойдет речь, произошли зимой 1943–44 годов, когда фашисты приняли зверское решение: использовать воспитанников Полоцкого детского дома № 1 как доноров.
События, о которых пойдет речь, произошли зимой 1943–44 годов, когда фашисты приняли зверское решение: использовать воспитанников Полоцкого детского дома № 1 как доноров. Немецким раненным солдатам нужна была кровь. Где её взять? У детей. Первым встал на защиту мальчишек и девчонок директор детского дома Михаил Степанович Форинко. Конечно, для оккупантов никакого значения не имели жалость, сострадание и вообще сам факт такого зверства, поэтому сразу было ясно: это не аргументы. Зато весомым стало рассуждение: как могут больные и голодные дети дать хорошую кровь? Никак.
User Comments
Not to mention that oftentimes the AI does work! See this quick article for an example: https://wasyaco.com/w/20260815
Would I have come up with this solution on my own? I doubt it. Does it save me time and improve efficiency? Absolutely.
AI is very powerful, and works better than ever, and continues improving. Sure, a lot of it is fraud, a lot of it is questionable, and even the best modern AI will try to ruin your codebase, if you let it. (A junior programmer would also ruin your codebase if you let him.)
Fundamentally, I believe the GPT architecture actually go it right. The way brain works, the way neurons work. Each neuron does integrals, and together they *predict*, anticipate something, and that anticipation is what builds the world around us. The "attention" mechanic that divides computation into key, query, value, seems to work so well. And arguably, there is no cognition outside language. GPT does very well with language, with plain text, and generating (and consuming) plain-text instructions. Amazingly, even if all GPT does is give you probability of the next token, this alone is so powerful, that it looks like cognition.
So yeah. We are at the very scary place where AI *is* becoming indispensable. Even in defending yourself against AI.
Not to mention that oftentimes the AI does work! See this quick article for an example: https://wasyaco.com/w/20260815
Would I have come up with this solution on my own? I doubt it. Does it save me time and improve efficiency? Absolutely.
AI is very powerful, and works better than ever, and continues improving. Sure, a lot of it is fraud, a lot of it is questionable, and even the best modern AI will try to ruin your codebase, if you let it. (A junior programmer would also ruin your codebase if you let him.)
Fundamentally, I believe the GPT architecture actually go it right. The way brain works, the way neurons work. Each neuron does integrals, and together they *predict*, anticipate something, and that anticipation is what builds the world around us. The "attention" mechanic that divides computation into key, query, value, seems to work so well. And arguably, there is no cognition outside language. GPT does very well with language, with plain text, and generating (and consuming) plain-text instructions. Amazingly, even if all GPT does is give you probability of the next token, this alone is so powerful, that it looks like cognition.
So yeah. We are at the very scary place where AI *is* becoming indispensable. Even in defending yourself against AI.
Not to mention that oftentimes the AI does work! See this quick article for an example: https://wasyaco.com/w/20260815
Would I have come up with this solution on my own? I doubt it. Does it save me time and improve efficiency? Absolutely.
AI is very powerful, and works better than ever, and continues improving. Sure, a lot of it is fraud, a lot of it is questionable, and even the best modern AI will try to ruin your codebase, if you let it. (A junior programmer would also ruin your codebase if you let him.)
Fundamentally, I believe the GPT architecture actually go it right. The way brain works, the way neurons work. Each neuron does integrals, and together they *predict*, anticipate something, and that anticipation is what builds the world around us. The "attention" mechanic that divides computation into key, query, value, seems to work so well. And arguably, there is no cognition outside language. GPT does very well with language, with plain text, and generating (and consuming) plain-text instructions. Amazingly, even if all GPT does is give you probability of the next token, this alone is so powerful, that it looks like cognition.
So yeah. We are at the very scary place where AI *is* becoming indispensable. Even in defending yourself against AI.
Not to mention that oftentimes the AI does work! See this quick article for an example: https://wasyaco.com/w/20260815
Would I have come up with this solution on my own? I doubt it. Does it save me time and improve efficiency? Absolutely.
AI is very powerful, and works better than ever, and continues improving. Sure, a lot of it is fraud, a lot of it is questionable, and even the best modern AI will try to ruin your codebase, if you let it. (A junior programmer would also ruin your codebase if you let him.)
Fundamentally, I believe the GPT architecture actually go it right. The way brain works, the way neurons work. Each neuron does integrals, and together they *predict*, anticipate something, and that anticipation is what builds the world around us. The "attention" mechanic that divides computation into key, query, value, seems to work so well. And arguably, there is no cognition outside language. GPT does very well with language, with plain text, and generating (and consuming) plain-text instructions. Amazingly, even if all GPT does is give you probability of the next token, this alone is so powerful, that it looks like cognition.
So yeah. We are at the very scary place where AI *is* becoming indispensable. Even in defending yourself against AI.
Not to mention that oftentimes the AI does work! See this quick article for an example: https://wasyaco.com/w/20260815
Would I have come up with this solution on my own? I doubt it. Does it save me time and improve efficiency? Absolutely.
AI is very powerful, and works better than ever, and continues improving. Sure, a lot of it is fraud, a lot of it is questionable, and even the best modern AI will try to ruin your codebase, if you let it. (A junior programmer would also ruin your codebase if you let him.)
Fundamentally, I believe the GPT architecture actually go it right. The way brain works, the way neurons work. Each neuron does integrals, and together they *predict*, anticipate something, and that anticipation is what builds the world around us. The "attention" mechanic that divides computation into key, query, value, seems to work so well. And arguably, there is no cognition outside language. GPT does very well with language, with plain text, and generating (and consuming) plain-text instructions. Amazingly, even if all GPT does is give you probability of the next token, this alone is so powerful, that it looks like cognition.
So yeah. We are at the very scary place where AI *is* becoming indispensable. Even in defending yourself against AI.
Not to mention that oftentimes the AI does work! See this quick article for an example: https://wasyaco.com/w/20260815
Would I have come up with this solution on my own? I doubt it. Does it save me time and improve efficiency? Absolutely.
AI is very powerful, and works better than ever, and continues improving. Sure, a lot of it is fraud, a lot of it is questionable, and even the best modern AI will try to ruin your codebase, if you let it. (A junior programmer would also ruin your codebase if you let him.)
Fundamentally, I believe the GPT architecture actually go it right. The way brain works, the way neurons work. Each neuron does integrals, and together they *predict*, anticipate something, and that anticipation is what builds the world around us. The "attention" mechanic that divides computation into key, query, value, seems to work so well. And arguably, there is no cognition outside language. GPT does very well with language, with plain text, and generating (and consuming) plain-text instructions. Amazingly, even if all GPT does is give you probability of the next token, this alone is so powerful, that it looks like cognition.
So yeah. We are at the very scary place where AI *is* becoming indispensable. Even in defending yourself against AI.
Not to mention that oftentimes the AI does work! See this quick article for an example: https://wasyaco.com/w/20260815
Would I have come up with this solution on my own? I doubt it. Does it save me time and improve efficiency? Absolutely.
AI is very powerful, and works better than ever, and continues improving. Sure, a lot of it is fraud, a lot of it is questionable, and even the best modern AI will try to ruin your codebase, if you let it. (A junior programmer would also ruin your codebase if you let him.)
Fundamentally, I believe the GPT architecture actually go it right. The way brain works, the way neurons work. Each neuron does integrals, and together they *predict*, anticipate something, and that anticipation is what builds the world around us. The "attention" mechanic that divides computation into key, query, value, seems to work so well. And arguably, there is no cognition outside language. GPT does very well with language, with plain text, and generating (and consuming) plain-text instructions. Amazingly, even if all GPT does is give you probability of the next token, this alone is so powerful, that it looks like cognition.
So yeah. We are at the very scary place where AI *is* becoming indispensable. Even in defending yourself against AI.
Not to mention that oftentimes the AI does work! See this quick article for an example: https://wasyaco.com/w/20260815
Would I have come up with this solution on my own? I doubt it. Does it save me time and improve efficiency? Absolutely.
AI is very powerful, and works better than ever, and continues improving. Sure, a lot of it is fraud, a lot of it is questionable, and even the best modern AI will try to ruin your codebase, if you let it. (A junior programmer would also ruin your codebase if you let him.)
Fundamentally, I believe the GPT architecture actually go it right. The way brain works, the way neurons work. Each neuron does integrals, and together they *predict*, anticipate something, and that anticipation is what builds the world around us. The "attention" mechanic that divides computation into key, query, value, seems to work so well. And arguably, there is no cognition outside language. GPT does very well with language, with plain text, and generating (and consuming) plain-text instructions. Amazingly, even if all GPT does is give you probability of the next token, this alone is so powerful, that it looks like cognition.
So yeah. We are at the very scary place where AI *is* becoming indispensable. Even in defending yourself against AI.
Not to mention that oftentimes the AI does work! See this quick article for an example: https://wasyaco.com/w/20260815
Would I have come up with this solution on my own? I doubt it. Does it save me time and improve efficiency? Absolutely.
AI is very powerful, and works better than ever, and continues improving. Sure, a lot of it is fraud, a lot of it is questionable, and even the best modern AI will try to ruin your codebase, if you let it. (A junior programmer would also ruin your codebase if you let him.)
Fundamentally, I believe the GPT architecture actually go it right. The way brain works, the way neurons work. Each neuron does integrals, and together they *predict*, anticipate something, and that anticipation is what builds the world around us. The "attention" mechanic that divides computation into key, query, value, seems to work so well. And arguably, there is no cognition outside language. GPT does very well with language, with plain text, and generating (and consuming) plain-text instructions. Amazingly, even if all GPT does is give you probability of the next token, this alone is so powerful, that it looks like cognition.
So yeah. We are at the very scary place where AI *is* becoming indispensable. Even in defending yourself against AI.