Название

UserAllContent

Content by piousbox

Притча о говне⁠⁠


Притча о говне⁠⁠

В лесу жило говно. Однажды в лес пошёл мудрец. Говно выскочило из леса перед мудрецом и прокричало грозным голосом "Я тебя съем". Мудрец испугался и убежал.
Мораль. Говна бояться в лес не ходить.

Потом в лес пошёл второй мудрец. Перед ним выскочило говно и прокричало "Я тебя съем". Мудрец не испугался и пнул говно ногой. Говно завоняло.
Мораль. Ты можешь бороться с говном, но говно будет вонять.

Ирландцы своих не бросают


Первого августа 1914 года экспедиция, возглавляемая Шеклтоном, отправилась в Антарктику с грандиозной целью - пересечь ледяной континент через Южный полюс.

Этот человек погиб через несколько секунд после того, как был сделан снимок.


Этот человек погиб через несколько секунд после того, как был сделан снимок. Это фото носит название «Комбат». Оно не является постановочным и не является кадром из фильма.
12 июля 1942 года возле села Хорошее фотограф Макс Альперт успел сделать снимок человека, поднявшего роту солдат в атаку, и тут же осколок снаряда разбил камеру. Фотограф решил, что кадры испорчены и не стал записывать имя человека, которого сфотографировал. Уже позже, проявляя пленку, он увидел, что кадр получился превосходным.

User Comments

Well, our "supreme" judicial system ruled against Leonard, and I agree in this case. Because watching a TV ad does not constitute a binding contractual agreement. Even if the ad was serious (it wasn't), the ad is not a contract. Pepsi never owed Leonard a fighter jet.

Frontier is just milking the story for more PR. Good for them. Or rather, whatever.
Well, our "supreme" judicial system ruled against Leonard, and I agree in this case. Because watching a TV ad does not constitute a binding contractual agreement. Even if the ad was serious (it wasn't), the ad is not a contract. Pepsi never owed Leonard a fighter jet.

Frontier is just milking the story for more PR. Good for them. Or rather, whatever.
Well, our "supreme" judicial system ruled against Leonard, and I agree in this case. Because watching a TV ad does not constitute a binding contractual agreement. Even if the ad was serious (it wasn't), the ad is not a contract. Pepsi never owed Leonard a fighter jet.

Frontier is just milking the story for more PR. Good for them. Or rather, whatever.
Well, our "supreme" judicial system ruled against Leonard, and I agree in this case. Because watching a TV ad does not constitute a binding contractual agreement. Even if the ad was serious (it wasn't), the ad is not a contract. Pepsi never owed Leonard a fighter jet.

Frontier is just milking the story for more PR. Good for them. Or rather, whatever.
To be clear: this doesn't mean that RT doesn't want piousbox dot com to share their content. On the contrary: that is encouraged. And it is the European Union centralists who say that sharing RT content is illegal because the content is banned.

EU lacks the first and second amendment freedoms that USA citizens seem to enjoy. Those freedoms are the right to free speech and the right to defend your free speech. I'm not saying USA has much free speech, but maybe Europe has even less.
To be clear: this doesn't mean that RT doesn't want piousbox dot com to share their content. On the contrary: that is encouraged. And it is the European Union centralists who say that sharing RT content is illegal because the content is banned.

EU lacks the first and second amendment freedoms that USA citizens seem to enjoy. Those freedoms are the right to free speech and the right to defend your free speech. I'm not saying USA has much free speech, but maybe Europe has even less.
To be clear: this doesn't mean that RT doesn't want piousbox dot com to share their content. On the contrary: that is encouraged. And it is the European Union centralists who say that sharing RT content is illegal because the content is banned.

EU lacks the first and second amendment freedoms that USA citizens seem to enjoy. Those freedoms are the right to free speech and the right to defend your free speech. I'm not saying USA has much free speech, but maybe Europe has even less.
To be clear: this doesn't mean that RT doesn't want piousbox dot com to share their content. On the contrary: that is encouraged. And it is the European Union centralists who say that sharing RT content is illegal because the content is banned.

EU lacks the first and second amendment freedoms that USA citizens seem to enjoy. Those freedoms are the right to free speech and the right to defend your free speech. I'm not saying USA has much free speech, but maybe Europe has even less.
Okay... spinal tap? Or did the migrants need to donate a finger?
Okay... spinal tap? Or did the migrants need to donate a finger?