Название

UserAllContent

Content by piousbox

На работе появилась новая начальница нашего отдела.

На работе появилась новая начальница нашего отдела. Ее нашёл и поставил на эту должность наш главный директор. Когда-то они вместе учились и работали, она, по его мнению, была хорошей сотрудницей. И сейчас она нассала ему в уши, как много она умеет, сколько у неё опыта и навыков. А на самом деле она — ноль. Не то чтобы не разбирается в тонкостях работы, а не знает азов вообще. Всю свою работу сваливает на других, называя это делегированием. Требует немыслимых результатов, которые не могут быть достигнуты чисто физически. Стучит на нас начальнику.

Чезаре Беккариа - человек, который заставил задуматься о совести.

В этот день, 15 марта 1738, родился человек, бросивший вызов жестокости законов.

Представьте себе XVIII век.
Европа, где следственные пытки, хоть и постепенно выходят из обихода, всё ещё применяются в некоторых странах, а площади городов то и дело становятся местом для публичных казней.
Здесь каждый приговор - это не только судьба отдельного человека, но и зрелище для толпы: плети, колёса, эшафоты.
И вот в этом мире, где жестокость остаётся частью правовой системы, появляется Чезаре Беккариа - миланский маркиз с лицом философа и смелостью революционера.

User Comments

Well, our "supreme" judicial system ruled against Leonard, and I agree in this case. Because watching a TV ad does not constitute a binding contractual agreement. Even if the ad was serious (it wasn't), the ad is not a contract. Pepsi never owed Leonard a fighter jet.

Frontier is just milking the story for more PR. Good for them. Or rather, whatever.
Well, our "supreme" judicial system ruled against Leonard, and I agree in this case. Because watching a TV ad does not constitute a binding contractual agreement. Even if the ad was serious (it wasn't), the ad is not a contract. Pepsi never owed Leonard a fighter jet.

Frontier is just milking the story for more PR. Good for them. Or rather, whatever.
Well, our "supreme" judicial system ruled against Leonard, and I agree in this case. Because watching a TV ad does not constitute a binding contractual agreement. Even if the ad was serious (it wasn't), the ad is not a contract. Pepsi never owed Leonard a fighter jet.

Frontier is just milking the story for more PR. Good for them. Or rather, whatever.
Well, our "supreme" judicial system ruled against Leonard, and I agree in this case. Because watching a TV ad does not constitute a binding contractual agreement. Even if the ad was serious (it wasn't), the ad is not a contract. Pepsi never owed Leonard a fighter jet.

Frontier is just milking the story for more PR. Good for them. Or rather, whatever.
To be clear: this doesn't mean that RT doesn't want piousbox dot com to share their content. On the contrary: that is encouraged. And it is the European Union centralists who say that sharing RT content is illegal because the content is banned.

EU lacks the first and second amendment freedoms that USA citizens seem to enjoy. Those freedoms are the right to free speech and the right to defend your free speech. I'm not saying USA has much free speech, but maybe Europe has even less.
To be clear: this doesn't mean that RT doesn't want piousbox dot com to share their content. On the contrary: that is encouraged. And it is the European Union centralists who say that sharing RT content is illegal because the content is banned.

EU lacks the first and second amendment freedoms that USA citizens seem to enjoy. Those freedoms are the right to free speech and the right to defend your free speech. I'm not saying USA has much free speech, but maybe Europe has even less.
To be clear: this doesn't mean that RT doesn't want piousbox dot com to share their content. On the contrary: that is encouraged. And it is the European Union centralists who say that sharing RT content is illegal because the content is banned.

EU lacks the first and second amendment freedoms that USA citizens seem to enjoy. Those freedoms are the right to free speech and the right to defend your free speech. I'm not saying USA has much free speech, but maybe Europe has even less.
To be clear: this doesn't mean that RT doesn't want piousbox dot com to share their content. On the contrary: that is encouraged. And it is the European Union centralists who say that sharing RT content is illegal because the content is banned.

EU lacks the first and second amendment freedoms that USA citizens seem to enjoy. Those freedoms are the right to free speech and the right to defend your free speech. I'm not saying USA has much free speech, but maybe Europe has even less.
Okay... spinal tap? Or did the migrants need to donate a finger?
Okay... spinal tap? Or did the migrants need to donate a finger?