Название
piousbox

UserAllContent

Content by piousbox

Обзор бесплодных земель (хищник) 2025

Movie Reviews

Предупреждение: спойлеры. Смотрите фильм перед чтением!

Как я часто делаю, я купил DVD этого фильма, не читая рецензий, и смотрел его. Многие фильмы, которые я смотрю таким образом, оказываются плохими или очень плохими. Тем не менее, это удивило меня, насколько хорошим был фильм, по крайней мере для меня. И хотя это не мой любимый фильм (не достаточно сложный, не достаточно «лучший»), он занимает очень высокое место для меня. Также мне нравится фильм «Хищник». Поэтому я в целом одобряю франшизу - у нее хорошие бои, и они сделали действительно хорошие фильмы во франшизе.

Опубликовано piousbox -

202602904 на AI Slop

Daily Grift

Ежедневная рубрика включает в себя некоторые мои наблюдения о вещах, которые не имеют для меня смысла в потребленных СМИ. Они не обязательно ежедневные, колонка просто называется так. Но я стараюсь делать это ежедневно. Но без гарантий.

Опубликовано piousbox -

User Comments

Hombre que demandó a Pepsi sobre Jet Fighter Finalmente obtiene su recompensa 30 años después
Well, our "supreme" judicial system ruled against Leonard, and I agree in this case. Because watching a TV ad does not constitute a binding contractual agreement. Even if the ad was serious (it wasn't), the ad is not a contract. Pepsi never owed Leonard a fighter jet.

Frontier is just milking the story for more PR. Good for them. Or rather, whatever.
Hombre que demandó a Pepsi sobre Jet Fighter Finalmente obtiene su recompensa 30 años después
Well, our "supreme" judicial system ruled against Leonard, and I agree in this case. Because watching a TV ad does not constitute a binding contractual agreement. Even if the ad was serious (it wasn't), the ad is not a contract. Pepsi never owed Leonard a fighter jet.

Frontier is just milking the story for more PR. Good for them. Or rather, whatever.
Man Who Sued Pepsi Over Fighter Jet Finally Gets His Reward 30 Years Later
Well, our "supreme" judicial system ruled against Leonard, and I agree in this case. Because watching a TV ad does not constitute a binding contractual agreement. Even if the ad was serious (it wasn't), the ad is not a contract. Pepsi never owed Leonard a fighter jet.

Frontier is just milking the story for more PR. Good for them. Or rather, whatever.
Man Who Sued Pepsi Over Fighter Jet Finally Gets His Reward 30 Years Later
Well, our "supreme" judicial system ruled against Leonard, and I agree in this case. Because watching a TV ad does not constitute a binding contractual agreement. Even if the ad was serious (it wasn't), the ad is not a contract. Pepsi never owed Leonard a fighter jet.

Frontier is just milking the story for more PR. Good for them. Or rather, whatever.
La corte de la UE respalda el procesamiento penal por compartir videos RT
To be clear: this doesn't mean that RT doesn't want piousbox dot com to share their content. On the contrary: that is encouraged. And it is the European Union centralists who say that sharing RT content is illegal because the content is banned.

EU lacks the first and second amendment freedoms that USA citizens seem to enjoy. Those freedoms are the right to free speech and the right to defend your free speech. I'm not saying USA has much free speech, but maybe Europe has even less.
La corte de la UE respalda el procesamiento penal por compartir videos RT
To be clear: this doesn't mean that RT doesn't want piousbox dot com to share their content. On the contrary: that is encouraged. And it is the European Union centralists who say that sharing RT content is illegal because the content is banned.

EU lacks the first and second amendment freedoms that USA citizens seem to enjoy. Those freedoms are the right to free speech and the right to defend your free speech. I'm not saying USA has much free speech, but maybe Europe has even less.
EU court backs criminal prosecution for sharing RT videos
To be clear: this doesn't mean that RT doesn't want piousbox dot com to share their content. On the contrary: that is encouraged. And it is the European Union centralists who say that sharing RT content is illegal because the content is banned.

EU lacks the first and second amendment freedoms that USA citizens seem to enjoy. Those freedoms are the right to free speech and the right to defend your free speech. I'm not saying USA has much free speech, but maybe Europe has even less.
EU court backs criminal prosecution for sharing RT videos
To be clear: this doesn't mean that RT doesn't want piousbox dot com to share their content. On the contrary: that is encouraged. And it is the European Union centralists who say that sharing RT content is illegal because the content is banned.

EU lacks the first and second amendment freedoms that USA citizens seem to enjoy. Those freedoms are the right to free speech and the right to defend your free speech. I'm not saying USA has much free speech, but maybe Europe has even less.
España: 70% de los inmigrantes no acompañados son en realidad adultos
Okay... spinal tap? Or did the migrants need to donate a finger?
España: 70% de los inmigrantes no acompañados son en realidad adultos
Okay... spinal tap? Or did the migrants need to donate a finger?